Thursday, September 17, 2009

I wouldn't want to live in Czechoslavkia or Poland

The decision to abandon the “third site” deployment of 10 missile interceptors in Poland and a radar in the Czech Republic violates President Obama’s pledge to support missile defense that is “pragmatic and cost-effective.” Ground based missile defense is effective, affordable, and available now. According to the Congressional Budget Office, alternatives to the third site do not provide a comparable level of defense. The CBO concluded that the estimated $9-14 billion 20-year cost of the third site was half of the estimated costs of a sea-based alternative. Abandoning our best missile defense option in Europe only encourages Iran to speed up their ballistic missile program so that they can get their threat in place before a European missile defense system is available.

The Poles and the Czechs know what it means to live under the boot of Russian domination. The third-site issue is of huge symbolic importance to both nations, and if Moscow emerges the victor, with an effective veto over U.S. policy in Europe, it would represent a massive surrender of American strategic influence and a betrayal of two of its closest friends in the region.

Once again, we, the Czechs, the Poles, and the world are being "misinformed". Obama, in his statement, says it's cheaper and more effective to use "portable" defenses. Not true. Once again, the threat of a resurgent Russia to eastern Europe becomes more of reality, thanks to Mr. Obama.

1 comment:

Mike West said...

We will see an unprecedented arms race from our enemies during this administration.